2008-2009 Policy Debate Topic Announced

January 9, 2008 – 11:59 am by: Adam Jacobi

The National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) today announced the results of the Policy Debate topic balloting. Out of 38 votes cast by several states, the NFL, NCFL and NDCA, 32 were in favor of Alternative Energy: Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives in the United States. Some additional information about the topic follows…

The demand for energy worldwide is expected to grow over 50 percent by 2030, and most economies are fundamentally fossil-fuel based. International competition for these fossil fuels is growing intense and access to oil especially is often located in places that are geographically hard to reach and geopolitically challenging. The United States federal government needs to articulate a sound and sustainable energy policy that pursues alternative energy resources, so that it has access to available, sustainable, and secure sources that move the country away from its addiction to fossil fuels. Affirmative plans would require the use of incentives to promote alternative energy sources, including but not limited to solar, wind, geothermal, hydroelectric, and nuclear power, as well as, biofuels, hydrogen fuels, new technologies, and conservation measures. Negative approaches to the topic would include a number of case specific solvency debates, the problems and impacts of using government incentives, and many different disadvantage scenarios such as foreign policy implications of decreasing oil imports, collapse of economies such as those of the Middle East and Russia, and relations disadvantages, as well as, a good number of disadvantages specific to particular affirmative solutions. Counterplan ground might include states/private industry, as well as, international solutions, and critical argumentation might include capitalism and the environment. Current federal policy tends to support big oil and other fossil fuel companies; ultimately, our very civilization will pay a high price for our lack of oversight and action on the issue of energy.

  1. 10 Responses to “2008-2009 Policy Debate Topic Announced”

  2. Wahoo!!

    By Jon Voss on Jan 9, 2008

  3. Can you disclose what Wisconsin voted for?

    By Nick Bubb on Jan 9, 2008

  4. We voted for Alternative Energy.

    By Laura Maly on Jan 9, 2008

  5. YAAAAAY!

    By Steve Finch on Jan 9, 2008

  6. This is fabulous. I’m quite pleased.

    By Amjad on Jan 9, 2008

  7. I think this is going to be a great topic. Especially given the sheer amount of freedom given to debaters by terms like ‘incentive’ and ‘alternative energy’ - I dare say that we can get our creative juices flowing on this one more so than on other topics.

    By Thomas Hegland on Jan 9, 2008

  8. One of the things I’m liking best about this resolution is that it can be politically neutral. There are lots of plan areas that are really left or really right. I hope it will make for some good politics debates this election season.

    Of course I’m sure everything will continue to lead to mass extinction, nuclear war or terrorism….. :)

    By John Knetzger on Jan 10, 2008

  9. …everything causes extinction, John. I thought you would’ve figured that out by now :)

    By Jon Voss on Jan 10, 2008

  10. So what would an aff case be?

    By debate on Jan 12, 2008

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Jan 9, 2008: NFL » 2008-2009 Policy Debate Topic Announced

Post a Comment